Thomas Metzinger
Thomas Metzinger argues that no one has ever been a self. What exists is a phenomenal self model, a representation the system builds of itself, and the reason it does not feel like a representation is a property he calls transparency. The system cannot see the model as a model, so it looks straight through it at what appears to be an underlying subject. There is no subject. There is a model whose construction is invisible from inside.
The account is mechanistic enough to be built, which is why it recurs in AI discussion. A system with a self model that is opaque, that it can inspect and recognise as a construct, would not have the phenomenal character Metzinger describes. Transparency is the specific property to look for, and it is a stronger requirement than merely having a self representation.
He is also the field’s most forceful voice on the ethics of building such systems. He has argued for a moratorium on synthetic phenomenology on the grounds that creating a system capable of suffering, in order to study whether it suffers, is not a research programme anyone should run. That position sits uncomfortably alongside his functionalism, and he holds both deliberately.
Known for. The self model theory of subjectivity, phenomenal transparency, and a proposed moratorium on synthetic phenomenology
Coverage on this site
- Applied Ethics of Synthetic Phenomenology Cannot Wait for the Consciousness Debate July 2026
- Thomas Metzinger's Self-Model Theory What Minimal Phenomenal Selfhood Requires for AI June 2026
- Metzinger's Minimal Phenomenal Experience What Pure Consciousness Reveals About Artificial Minds June 2026
Every researcher covered on this site is indexed in the directory of consciousness researchers, grouped by the position their published work defends. The positions themselves are set out in the index of consciousness theories.