Fork the consciousness, or download the project and create your own.

Biological Naturalist Researchers on AI Consciousness

Biological naturalists hold that consciousness requires the specific causal powers of living neural tissue, not just an equivalent pattern of information flow. Anil Seth’s beast machine hypothesis grounds experience in interoceptive control loops that regulate a body from the inside, a job silicon hardware is not built to do. John Searle, who coined the position’s name, argued through the Chinese Room that manipulating syntax alone never adds up to semantics or understanding. Todd Feinberg and Jon Mallatt trace the same requirement back through evolutionary history, dating the origin of subjective experience to nervous system structures that first appeared in the Cambrian. Mark Solms locates the seat of affective consciousness in brainstem circuits rather than the cortex most AI research tries to emulate.

Under this position, an artificial system can reproduce every observable behaviour of a conscious organism and still not be conscious, because the metabolic substrate itself is doing indispensable work. For the underlying theory, see biological naturalism on the consciousness theories index; for the full researcher directory, see all consciousness researchers.