Fork the consciousness, or download the project and create your own.

Jonathan Simon

Université de Montréal

Functionalist What matters is the organisation of the processing, not the material

Jonathan Simon is a philosopher at the Université de Montréal working on consciousness, indeterminacy, and the metaphysics of mind. His published work defends the possibility that there is no fact of the matter about whether some systems are conscious, that the property can be vague at its boundaries the way many natural properties are. That thesis, sometimes called phenomenal indeterminacy, is not a dodge. It is a claim about how consciousness relates to the physical world, with direct consequences for artificial systems that sit between the paradigm cases.

Simon is a co-author of the Butlin and Long indicator-properties report, this site’s nineteen researcher checklist, where his expertise informs the report’s careful handling of whether consciousness is all-or-nothing, graded, multidimensional, or composed of separable elements. The report’s box on determinacy, degrees, and dimensions carries his fingerprints, and the site’s own assessment posts inherit that caution.

The position matters for AI consciousness because current systems are exactly the kind of borderline case the thesis predicts. A language model may satisfy some indicators and fail others, and Simon’s framework licenses the honest verdict, that such systems may be indeterminate rather than simply absent of experience. His profile anchors the site’s coverage of the indeterminacy position.

Known for. Indeterminate and graded consciousness, philosophy of AI consciousness, consciousness in blurry cases, indicator properties collaboration

Coverage on this site

Related researchers