David Chalmers
New York University. Co-director, Center for Mind, Brain and Consciousness
Functionalist What matters is the organisation of the processing, not the material
Position on AI consciousness
Chalmers holds that consciousness is not obviously tied to biology and that a system with the right organisation could be conscious. He puts current language models at probably not conscious, while arguing that the reasons for confidence are weaker than people assume.
David Chalmers gave the field its central problem and its vocabulary. The hard problem is the question of why physical processing is accompanied by experience at all, as distinct from the easy problems of explaining discrimination, integration, reportability and control. Those easy problems are hard in the ordinary sense and will yield to normal science. The hard one is different in kind, because a complete functional account leaves the question untouched.
His position on artificial systems follows from that and is more permissive than his reputation suggests. Chalmers holds that consciousness is not obviously tied to biology, that a system with the right organisation could be conscious, and that current language models probably are not but that the reasons for confidence are weaker than people assume. He has put explicit probabilities on it rather than asserting a verdict, which is unusual and useful.
The caution he urges is epistemic. We are poor judges of which systems are conscious, our intuitions were shaped by encountering only biological minds, and a system trained on human text is optimised to produce exactly the signals those intuitions respond to. That is a different worry from the claim that machines cannot be conscious, and the two are frequently conflated.
Known for. Naming the hard problem of consciousness, and the philosophical zombie argument
Coverage on this site
Research Papers and Preprints
- David Chalmers Moral Weight and the Probability of LLM Sentience in 2026 August 2026
- Anil Seth Mythology of Conscious AI Biological Naturalism Berggruen Prize Essay August 2026
- Andy Clark's Predictive Processing Framework and What It Actually Implies for LLMs July 2026
- What AI Researchers Actually Believe About AI Subjective Experience July 2026
- The Zombie Gap in AI Consciousness Where 2026 Biological Naturalism Research Draws the Line June 2026
- Emergent Language as an Approach to Conscious AI and A Generative Methodology from Osaka June 2026
- Belief Formation and Meta-Cognitive Monitoring in LLMs and Empirical Support for the HOT-3 Consciousness Indicator June 2026
- Chalmers on LLMs Virtual Entities, Quasi-Agency, and the Question of AI Welfare May 2026
- Consciousness Indicators, Mimicry, and the Problem of Internal Variants May 2026
- The Calibration Problem Why AI Consciousness Indicators Need Biological Grounding May 2026
- Can We Validate AI Consciousness Indicators? The Hard Problem Behind the Checklist April 2026
- What Would AI Consciousness Actually Look Like? The 14-Indicator Checklist Explained March 2026
Books and Monographs
Keynotes and Event Talks
Articles and Commentary
Related researchers
-
Anil SethSussex Centre for Consciousness Science, University of SussexThe beast machine hypothesis, and controlled hallucination as an account of perception
- Karl FristonUniversity College London. Chief Scientist, VERSES AIThe free energy principle and active inference
- Keith FrankishUniversity of SheffieldIllusionism about phenomenal consciousness
-
Daniel DennettTufts University. 1942 to 2024The Multiple Drafts Model, the Cartesian Theater critique, and heterophenomenology
- Noemi DrekslerCentre for the Governance of AIExpert and public surveys on AI subjective experience, AI consciousness governance, moral uncertainty about artificial minds
- Patrick ButlinEleos AI Research. Previously the Global Priorities Institute, OxfordLead author of the indicator properties framework for assessing consciousness in AI systems
David Chalmers is listed with the other functionalists and computationalists, who hold that what matters is the organisation of the processing, not the material. The theory family behind that position is set out in the index of consciousness theories. Every researcher covered on this site is indexed in the directory of consciousness researchers.